<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garfield minus Garfield</title>
	<link>http://digimills.com/2008/02/26/garfield-minus-garfield/</link>
	<description>curiosity rising</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bull Moose</title>
		<link>http://digimills.com/2008/02/26/garfield-minus-garfield/#comment-26199</link>
		<author>Bull Moose</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://digimills.com/2008/02/26/garfield-minus-garfield/#comment-26199</guid>
		<description>Along a similar line, I figured out a long time ago (or someone told me, I can't remember) that Garfield was even funnier if you just deleted Garfield's lines, at least in strips where Jon was present.. 
I think it might work even better than removing all of Garfield, because you get Garfield's expressions conveying the fact that even a goddam cat thinks Jon is a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along a similar line, I figured out a long time ago (or someone told me, I can&#8217;t remember) that Garfield was even funnier if you just deleted Garfield&#8217;s lines, at least in strips where Jon was present..<br />
I think it might work even better than removing all of Garfield, because you get Garfield&#8217;s expressions conveying the fact that even a goddam cat thinks Jon is a loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
