Comments on: An Unreasonable Man http://digimills.com/2007/11/15/an-unreasonable-man/ curiosity rising Tue, 22 May 2012 01:02:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Howard http://digimills.com/2007/11/15/an-unreasonable-man/#comment-23448 Howard Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:28:38 +0000 http://digimills.com/2007/11/15/an-unreasonable-man/#comment-23448 Ah I really wish I'd gotten a chance to talk to someone like Mr. Easely because I was really disappointed that nobody in the film talked about the "spoiler" issue being a flaw in the election system that can and should be fixed. Even Nader himself doesn't focus on that. Yet to me it's the most important issue in the whole film, possibly, and isn't even discussed. I wrote about this in my post <a href="http://www.systemsthinker.com/blog/2007/12/an-unreasonable-man/" title="Instant" rel="nofollow">Instant Runoff Voting Excluded: An Unreasonable Omission from An Unreasonable Man</a>. Hope you'll check it out and let me know what you think. I'm hoping more people on both sides of the debate about Nader's presidential runs will band together to work for things like Instant Runoff Voting so we have no more "spoilers" and no more people scapegoated just for running for office in a democracy. Ah I really wish I’d gotten a chance to talk to someone like Mr. Easely because I was really disappointed that nobody in the film talked about the “spoiler” issue being a flaw in the election system that can and should be fixed. Even Nader himself doesn’t focus on that. Yet to me it’s the most important issue in the whole film, possibly, and isn’t even discussed.

I wrote about this in my post Instant Runoff Voting Excluded: An Unreasonable Omission from An Unreasonable Man. Hope you’ll check it out and let me know what you think. I’m hoping more people on both sides of the debate about Nader’s presidential runs will band together to work for things like Instant Runoff Voting so we have no more “spoilers” and no more people scapegoated just for running for office in a democracy.

]]>